PyroMystic wrote:And can someone give me simple explanation about Quantum Mechanics in general? I watched and read some popular science book on this but some say that that's unscientific and not what scientists understand about Quantum Mechanics.
Giving a simple explanation of QM is quite the task! Especially since most people will have no formal education in the topic, even here in the West. (And, for the record, Eastern cultures tend to have an easier time understanding QM since they are less likely to be taught in strict Aristotelian logic; that is, “every thing must be true or false”, whereas Eastern philosophies tend to allow for blending of the two.)
If your thesis depends on a proper understanding, I highly suggest reading more books on the topic instead of relying on a Chinese history forum. Not that people here lack knowledge about it (I have some since I have studied causation both in and out of schooling, though only theoretically and not mathematically), but because QM is very difficult to explain simply, and especially because writing a thesis requires proper sourcing.
Recommendations:
One book I personally own is “Quantum Physics: A First Encounter: Interference, Entanglement, and Reality” by Valerio Scarani. Unlike many other books on the topic, he doesn’t get deep into the mathematics; you can get by with just a basic high school level algebraic understanding. He has other good introductory books as well.
If you have a more solid mathematical background, then “Introduction to Quantum Mechanics” by David Griffiths is widely popular, and is used in schools as well. It requires basic calculus, but it isn’t overwhelming like many other books of this level and takes time to thoroughly explain topics.
My personal go-to is purely theoretical, though maybe not good for thesis work: “Quantum Psychology” by Robert Anton Wilson. He’s primarily a satirist writer so he’s a bit off the wall at times

