Three Kingdoms Questions (You Ask, We Answer)

Join the Romance of the Three Kingdoms discussion with our resident Scholars. Topics relating to the novel and history are both welcome. Don't forget to check the Forum Rules before posting.
Kongming’s Archives: Romance of the Three Kingdoms
Three Kingdoms Officer Biographies
Three Kingdoms Officer Encyclopedia
Scholars of Shen Zhou Search Tool

Re: Three Kingdoms Questions (You Ask, We Answer)

Unread postby Dong Zhou » Mon Oct 16, 2017 11:10 am

Sun Fin wrote:In case you can't tell I'm interested in learning about Confucianism at the moment!

I feel like we see a trend in religion/philosophy during the 3K era.

The literate elite were largely orthodox Confucians, at least the ones at court seemed to be so. In comparison the common people seemed more likely to engage in Daoist peasant rebellions.

There are exceptions (Zhang Lu comes to mind) but as a general statement do you think it is fair to suggest that whilst the court and educated officials adhered to Confucianism (or at least paid it lip service) for the poor and in more rural areas those beliefs held less sway?


Probably. The people seemed to go where they were safe (or felt safe) and where they would be hope either through faith-healing or good governance. There didn't seem to be anti-Buddhism or neo-Daosim revolts from the general populace. Rulers also seem to be less inclined towards caring about cementing further Confucian control

ValHellen wrote:'They', as in her own father and family? But what was the purpose of this?

Also, anything on Liushi of Wu?


Her father was dead I believe, they were referring to Yuan Shu's ladies.

Daughter of wealthy merchant, Lu Fan wanted to marry her but her mother refused due to Lu Fan's poor status but father allowed marriage as he saw Lu Fan had potential.
User avatar
Dong Zhou
A-Dou
A-Dou
 
Posts: 16866
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: "Now we must die. May Your Majesty maintain yourself"

Re: Three Kingdoms Questions (You Ask, We Answer)

Unread postby ValHellen » Mon Oct 16, 2017 4:13 pm

Thank you for the answers, Dong Zhou.

Information on Shu officers are surprisingly very scarce in spite of the faction's folk popularity. I learned that Zhuge Liang banned historians from Shu's court, but a quick google search gave me someone saying that Zhuge Liang didn't ban the position as much as he never established any formal history bureau. Which one is correct? Any reason why Zhuge Liang didn't put much emphasis on records? You'd have thought with the amount of propagandas put out by the likes of Mi Zhu and Sun Qian Zhuge Liang'd have at least "manufactured" records of Shu. Why the silence?
User avatar
ValHellen
Apprentice
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 2:07 pm

Re: Three Kingdoms Questions (You Ask, We Answer)

Unread postby waywardauthor » Mon Oct 16, 2017 8:49 pm

Sun Fin wrote:
DragonAtma wrote:It varied from court to court; IIRC Cao Cao and Sun Quan were pure legalist, while Liu Bei was "Confucian in appearance but Legalist in substance".


I've heard the term 'legalism' tossed about a lot, largely in reference to Zhuge Liang, over the years I've been a member and I would say I've got a basic understanding of what it means in this context. However is there a text that gives a more detailed explanation of it or was it never as an organised philosophy as Confucianism?

Han Feizi and Lord Shang are chief champions of legalism, while Guanzi had some legalist elements before legalism was a thing.

The short answer to this is that legalism believes in the supreme rule of law and is inherently materialistic. It is often pragmatic, lends itself well to violence, and believes completely in (their idea of) meritocracy. Your value and existence is equal to the service you can do to the state. Draconian Laws are fine, so long as they work and are put against those whose value is more disposable. Of course, some of this belongs to how Confucian Critics viewed the philosophy.

As for how well known it is, it is perhaps the third best known school to emerge from the warring states behind Confucianism and Daoism, so there is plenty of information out there, just most of it will be in Chinese.
Alone I lean under the wispy shade of an aged tree,
Scornfully I raise to parted lips a cup of warm wine,
Longingly I cast an empty vessel aside those exposed roots,
And leave behind forgotten memories and forsaken dreams.
User avatar
waywardauthor
Scholar
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 11:27 am

Re: Three Kingdoms Questions (You Ask, We Answer)

Unread postby Han » Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:16 pm

ValHellen wrote:Thank you for the answers, Dong Zhou.

Information on Shu officers are surprisingly very scarce in spite of the faction's folk popularity. I learned that Zhuge Liang banned historians from Shu's court, but a quick google search gave me someone saying that Zhuge Liang didn't ban the position as much as he never established any formal history bureau. Which one is correct? Any reason why Zhuge Liang didn't put much emphasis on records? You'd have thought with the amount of propagandas put out by the likes of Mi Zhu and Sun Qian Zhuge Liang'd have at least "manufactured" records of Shu. Why the silence?


Zhuge Liang never ban historians. He just never set up a history department like their rivals Cao-Wei and Sun-Wu. As a result, the histories of Shu-Han were a mess at least compared to their rivals.

And blaming Zhuge Liang for the poor state of Shu-Han history is flat out stupid.

Liu Shan and his other ministers could always start up a history department if they so wish to. Its just that they never officially did so.

Regardless, Shu-Han had historians. Just not official ones.

For why they never emphasis on record of the histories, we dont really know...
Liu Bei did nothing wrong.
User avatar
Han
Changshi
 
Posts: 417
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2017 1:46 pm

Re: Three Kingdoms Questions (You Ask, We Answer)

Unread postby ValHellen » Tue Oct 17, 2017 2:01 am

Han wrote:Zhuge Liang never ban historians. He just never set up a history department like their rivals Cao-Wei and Sun-Wu. As a result, the histories of Shu-Han were a mess at least compared to their rivals.

And blaming Zhuge Liang for the poor state of Shu-Han history is flat out stupid.

Liu Shan and his other ministers could always start up a history department if they so wish to. Its just that they never officially did so.

Regardless, Shu-Han had historians. Just not official ones.

For why they never emphasis on record of the histories, we dont really know...

Blaming is a strong word. I only discovered what Zhuge Liang may or may not have done and stated what I discovered. I did not care to blame or not to blame him for anything on this.

That and, I'd have already guessed that the scarcity of information for Shu was due to something far more complicated than "It's all Kongming's fault! >:O" even if I don't know exactly what. At the very least I'm aware enough that reality is often far more complex than whatever we'd think.

My question is pointed more on why there was silence to begin with, whether it'd be from Zhuge Liang or from Liu Shan and other officials. It may just seem like it'd be one of those eternal mysteries of the Three Kingdoms.
User avatar
ValHellen
Apprentice
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 2:07 pm

Re: Three Kingdoms Questions (You Ask, We Answer)

Unread postby Han » Tue Oct 17, 2017 4:04 am

Right. Apologies.
Liu Bei did nothing wrong.
User avatar
Han
Changshi
 
Posts: 417
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2017 1:46 pm

Re: Three Kingdoms Questions (You Ask, We Answer)

Unread postby Han » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:50 am

I found the source on when and why Cheng Yu praised Guan Yu and Zhang Fei:
"Tàizǔ campaigned in Jīngzhōu [208], and Liú Bèi fled to Wú. Commentators believed Sūn Quán would certainly kill Bèi, but Yù predicted: “Sūn Quán is newly come to power, and is not yet feared Within the Seas. Lord Cáo has no match in the world Under Heaven. When he first raised up against Jīngzhōu, his authority shook beyond the Jiāng, and though [Sūn] Quán had planning ability, he cannot oppose us alone. Liú Bèi has heroic reputation, and Guān Yǔ and Zhāng Fēi are both a match for ten thousand enemies. [Sūn] Quán will certainly use them to oppose us. As his difficulty has been resolved, Liú Bèi is saved and cannot be taken and killed.” [Sūn] Quán indeed gave [Liú] Bèi troops to resist Tàizǔ."

Source: http://xuesanguo.tumblr.com/post/147780583978/141-chéng-yù-程昱-zhòngdé-仲徳
Liu Bei did nothing wrong.
User avatar
Han
Changshi
 
Posts: 417
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2017 1:46 pm

Re: Three Kingdoms Questions (You Ask, We Answer)

Unread postby Dong Zhou » Tue Oct 17, 2017 10:31 am

Thanks Han for finding that, was helpful learning the context.

ValHellen wrote:Thank you for the answers, Dong Zhou.

Information on Shu officers are surprisingly very scarce in spite of the faction's folk popularity. I learned that Zhuge Liang banned historians from Shu's court, but a quick google search gave me someone saying that Zhuge Liang didn't ban the position as much as he never established any formal history bureau. Which one is correct? Any reason why Zhuge Liang didn't put much emphasis on records? You'd have thought with the amount of propagandas put out by the likes of Mi Zhu and Sun Qian Zhuge Liang'd have at least "manufactured" records of Shu. Why the silence?


Mi Zhu and Sun Qian put out propaganda? One was a merchant and the other a sometimes diplomat.

Yeah Zhuge Liang banned histories is a common myth (that or he wrote the Shu sections of the SGZ) so the second (more or less): Chen Shou bemoaned a lack of history office but given he served in it Chen Shou was exaggerating a tad. However it was clear Shu's record system was awful

As for why Shu didn't have a proper one? Possibly that when Liu Bei set up a local hstory project the infighting was so bad that Liu Bei put on a play mocking the scholars so that may have put the likes of Liang off trying another project. History departments is also the sort of thing that gets dropped/sidelined when resources and officer core is limited, it is something courts mean to do but is a low priority.
User avatar
Dong Zhou
A-Dou
A-Dou
 
Posts: 16866
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: "Now we must die. May Your Majesty maintain yourself"

Re: Three Kingdoms Questions (You Ask, We Answer)

Unread postby Han » Tue Oct 17, 2017 12:06 pm

Liu Bei put on a play mocking the scholars


Source?
Liu Bei did nothing wrong.
User avatar
Han
Changshi
 
Posts: 417
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2017 1:46 pm

Re: Three Kingdoms Questions (You Ask, We Answer)

Unread postby ValHellen » Tue Oct 17, 2017 1:18 pm

Han wrote:Right. Apologies.

:D No hard feelings. I'm just glad we could clear that up.

Dong Zhou wrote:Mi Zhu and Sun Qian put out propaganda? One was a merchant and the other a sometimes diplomat.

Yeah Zhuge Liang banned histories is a common myth (that or he wrote the Shu sections of the SGZ) so the second (more or less): Chen Shou bemoaned a lack of history office but given he served in it Chen Shou was exaggerating a tad. However it was clear Shu's record system was awful

As for why Shu didn't have a proper one? Possibly that when Liu Bei set up a local hstory project the infighting was so bad that Liu Bei put on a play mocking the scholars so that may have put the likes of Liang off trying another project. History departments is also the sort of thing that gets dropped/sidelined when resources and officer core is limited, it is something courts mean to do but is a low priority.

Maybe that's why I shouldn't trust Wikipedia so fast. I read there that Mi Zhu, Sun Qian, Jian Yong and Yi Ji wrote essays that supported Liu Bei's government as Confucian, which went popular with the masses and propped his popularity. Did that not happen?

At any rate this seems the best explanation for the scarcity.
User avatar
ValHellen
Apprentice
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 2:07 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Sanguo Yanyi Symposium

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Copyright © 2002–2008 Kongming’s Archives. All Rights Reserved