Wang Rui, Cao Yin and Sun Jian

New postby Dong Zhou on Thu Jan 18, 2007 5:02 pm

Xu Yuan, GoS indicates that Liu Biao was the late Wang Rui's replacement as thingy of Jing. For more info on the Wang vs Yin:

http://www.anu.edu.au/asianstudies/decrespigny/peace1_part2.pdf

and http://www.anu.edu.au/asianstudies/decrespigny/gos_ch2.pdf

James

Well how many people, if given a 100% won't ever get punished, wouldn't kill an enemy? James, the GoS called Cao Yin Grand Administrator with Wang Rui as Inspector so I'm not sure what to believe.

As Governor of Jingzhou it doesn't seem too great a stretch that he might take authority to execute a subordinate. From my understanding, though, even in a position as powerful as this he would still need approval from the capital to execute one of his prefects


Yep, Governor if Jingzhou was not a postion that gave execution of officers privilage.

As for the two possibilities, Wang Rui did seem scared when Sun Jian's troops arrived but he may have imagined Sun Jian wouldn't make a move against him before hand. I think a mixture of mine and the second possibility would explain it.
“You, are a rebellious son who abandoned his father. You are a cruel brigand who murdered his lord. How can Heaven and Earth put up with you for long? And unless you die soon, how can you face the sight of men?”
User avatar
Dong Zhou
A-Dou
A-Dou
 
Posts: 6157
Joined: April 10, 2005
Location: "Now we must die. May Your Majesty maintain yourself"

New postby James on Thu Jan 18, 2007 6:11 pm

Xu Yuan wrote:I know it's not really supporting anything but, are we to assume that Chen zhou made the same mistake twice?

"When Emperor Ling passed away, Liu Biao was appointed as the Inspector of Jing province, taking over the post from Wang Rui." That would assume that he took the Inspector's post from a living Wang Rui but wouldn't that confabulate part's of history as we know?

Awesome! This clears a lot up. Liu Biao was governor of Jingzhou—governors/prefects in the region were considered his subordinates—so this simply seems to be the way in which he chose to render this title in this case. Though there is still a possibility of something much more mixed up, it looks like Wang Rui was indeed Governor of Jingzhou. The only exception would take place if we found somewhere that Liu Biao was later <i>promoted</i> to governor, but that doesn't answer the questions of why we never heard of the previous governor, why this is commonly regarded to be Liu Biao's official (and controversial) promotion, and the confusion between Chen Shou’s biography and Pei Songzhi’s notes.

Xu Yuan wrote:Then taking all the information I could find on the two (which sadly enough came from a debate on this very site...)

Before I created the topic I actually gathered all the historic information upon which this debate was founded and placed it into the encyclopedia entries for Wang Rui and Cao Yin linked to at the beginning of this thread. There are some updates I wish to make after this discussion, but it is probably the best original source for the knowledge on the ’net (outside reading Rafe de Crespigny’s discussion in <i>Generals of the South</i>.

Lu Kang wrote:He most certainly did not know that Cao Yin's order was a forged document. However, like I pointed out, there are many possible ways it could have been legal had everything been actually done. Since it could be legal, and Sun Jian, who's loyalty is not suspect considering his later (and earlier) actions, he would certainly find the order to be legal to his knowledge of the laws. Since Wang Rui was disloyal as proven by the fact that he was trying to illlegaly kill Cao Yin, Sun Jian was inactuality doing the right thing. The fact that Cao Yin was able to forge a convincing document to make it seem as though Sun Jian had an edict to kill him is of little use, considering it was the right thing to do.

Mostly accurate aside from the real possibility that Sun Jian may have known or strongly suspected (though going against the possibility that it is real, as mentioned earlier by Sun Gongli, is dangerous indeed). Also, it is unlikely that upholding Han authority was Sun Jian's chief concern here. He was kid of a jerk when he finally killed Wang Rui! :p

Exar Kun wrote:I don't think Wang Rui was right to do what he did,but he certainly could have had cause.There is no explanation of what their disagreement was.Suppose Cao Yin was opposing sending troops from his commandery to the capital?Certainly possible.And if Cao Yin had a problem with Wang Rui,he needs to report him,not falsify orders and have him killed.

A fine point of view.

Lu Kang wrote:2) You'll have to quote the Han Law or the Imperial Edict that says that, I'm not just going to take your word on this one. Is this something established in Han law, or is this something that your just stating as "common sense" or something that "should have happened".

Out of context I'm not completely sure what Lu Kang was talking about, but it seems most logical that he is wondering about the Governor of Jingzhou’s authority to take this action (something I have conveniently been studying the hell out of). I'll comment more on this in reply to Dong Zhuo.

Lu Kang wrote:3) Right there you said you don't think that Wang Rui was right. That's correct, he most certainly under no circumstance was allowed to do that. By your "Definition" he is a traitor because he was trying to kill an apparently loyal Han minister without going through the due process of law.

For whatever it is worth I imagine actions like this were quite common among loyal Han subjects and traitors alike. Wang Rui's greatest mistake was in actually tipping his hat and shooting his mouth off rather than simply doing it. Maybe it was a threat intended to bring Cao Yin about? We'll probably never know.

Xu Yuan wrote:Unfortunately I can't find a good translation of the Hou Han Shu, I would ask Lady Wu maybe to skin through it?

I'm sure she would have been happy to do so earlier. She doesn't have enough time now, I'll imagine. Maybe someone else will come along with an interest in doing so. :)
Kongming’s Archives – Romance of the Three Kingdoms Novel, History and Games
“The true measure of a man is how he treats someone that can do him absolutely no good.”
  —Samuel Johnson
User avatar
James
The Big Fish
The Big Fish
 
Posts: 16051
Joined: June 14, 2002
Location: Happy Valley, UT

New postby James on Thu Jan 18, 2007 6:45 pm


To Establish Peace; Dr. Rafe de Crespigny wrote:Some time earlier, Wang Rui the Inspector of Jing province had joined the Grand Administrator of Changsha, Sun Jian, to attack bandits in Lingling and Guiyang. Because Sun Jian held a military appointment, Wang Rui spoke slightingly of him. (22)

(22): This was in 187, when Sun Jian was first appointed Grand Administrator of Changsha and sent to put down the bandits: de Crespigny, <i>Huan and Ling</i> 1, 203. Wang Rui was evidently a man of good genrty and background who was resentful of the success and honour which had been given a simple fighting man such as Sun Jian. He mistakenly expressed his opinion in public.

When the provinces and commanderies gathered their forces to attack Dong Zhuo, Wang Rui and Sun Jian also raised troops. Wang Rui, however, had quarreled with the Grand Administrator of Wuling, Cao Yin, and he announced that his first priority was to kill Cao Yin.

Cao Yin, fearing for his own safety, forged an order from an officer of investigation and sent it to Sun Jian. The order listed Wang Rui's crimes and faults and authorized Sun Jian to arrest him, execute him, then submit a report (23). As soon as Sun Jian received it he led his forces against Wang Rui (24).

(23): The text here has the phrase "Ltinerant [Lieutenant?] Commissioner of Investigation." The title reflects the system of early Han, when officers of the court were sent on tours of inspection through the provinces: Bielenstein, <i>Bureaucracy</i>, 90; de Crespigny, "Inspection and Surveillance," 46-47. More recently, as in 142, similar visitations had again been commissioned: see, for example, de Crespigny, "Inspection and Surveillance," 75.

(24): The headquarters of the Inspector of Jing Province were at Hanshou in Wuling commandery, and the capital of the commandery was at Linyuan, less than twenty kilometers distant. This region lay on the main road where Sun Jian would take on his way north.

When Wang Rui learnt of the arrival of these troops, he climbed a tower and looked out, and then sent to ask, "What do you want?" Sun Jian's advance division [vanguard] replied, "We have long been suffering the toil of fighting and labour, and we have come to ask you for some recompense." Then Wang Rui saw Sun Jian [quoting <i>Wulu</i>, after he already entered the city] and he was alarmed and said, "The soldiers may want rewards, but why is Magistrate Sun here?" (25)

(25): "Magistrate" (<i>fujun</i>) was the term of address for the head of a commandery.

"I have orders to execute you," replied Sun Jian.

"What is my crime?" asked Wang Rui.

"You just don't understand things," answered Sun Jian.

In distress and despair, Wang Rui scraped gold and drank it and died (26).

(26): This style of self-immolation is by no means uncommon in Chinese history. <i>JS</i> [<i>Jin shu</i>] 31, 966, says that in 300 the infamous Empress Jia of Western Jin was compelled to kill herself by taking a draught of powdered gold in wine, and the custom remained until modern times: T'ien, <i>Male Anxiety and Female Chastity</i>, refers at 58 to two cases during the Ming dynasty of women committing suicide by swallowing gold. At 96, there is a detailed account of a woman attempting suicide in 1676 by swallowing fragments of broken copper coins, and plate 5 tells how the favored concubine of a Manchu general also sought to kill herself in 1885 by swallowing pieces of gold. She was found and saved just in time.
    Chapter 69 of the novel <i>Honglou meng</i> by Cao Xueqin of the late eighteenth century; Hawkes, Story of the Stone, 369-370, tells how the deceived concubine You Erjie killed herself in this manner.
    The character <i>jin</i>, of course, can refer to metal in general, not specifically to gold. Moreover, while lumps and large slivers, rather than scrapings, of metal would damage the intestines, pure gold is not of itself dangerous (it is regularly used in dentistry). So the substance used for suicide was either an ally of gold or some material resembling gold.
    For the first alternative, <i>ZZTJ</i> commentary ito this text quotes the sixth-century scholar Tao Hongjing, who says that some "raw gold" (<i>shengjin</i>) is poisonous unless it is refined by smelting. Tao's remarks are cited again in commentary to the section on Gold in <i>Bencao gangmu</i> 8, 3-4, which also quotes the eighth-century scholar Chen Cangqi, who tells of a poisonous raw gold found in the far south, which resembles red and black gravel. Chen ascribes the poison to the teeth or dung of poisonous snakes, or to the dung of the <i>yuan</i> bird; Schafer, <i>Vermilion Bird</i>, 162, interprets this "raw gold" as discolored auiferous quartz; Needham, Science and Civilisation V.2, 62, suggests that the poisoning came either from physical irritation by quartz particles in the powder or from chemical contamination by lead ores or pyritic sulphides, probably arsenical ores. A third possibility is that "raw
gold" is the <i>telluride Calaverite</i> [AuTe2], which can be red and black in colour and which would break down in contact with the acids of the stomach: tellurium is a poison.
    You Erjie in <i>Honglou meng</i> is said to have found a suitable nugget of raw gold in one of her storage boxes, but unrefined and unworked gold would not necessarily be readily available in a gentleman's official residence. It may be that Wang Rui took scrapings from a vessel made of imitation gold: Needham, <i>Science and Civilization</i> V.2, 195, refers to brasses, with varying quantities of zinc or arsenic, which resemble gold or silver, and at 224-225 he discusses the strong likelihood that the Chinese early incorporated arsenic into copper and bronze to make artificial gold and silver. On this last, Needham cites pharmacopoeias from pre- and post-Han times which mention the use of realgar and orpiment, sulphides of arsenic, to "make gold from copper." Scrapings of such material would surely prove poisonous.
    One should note, however, that although <i>Honglou meng</i> refers to death from eating raw gold as easier than hanging or drowning, poisoning by arsenic is quite remarkably painful, and would not be a method of choice. It is possible that Wang Rui and some others in his situation consumed "gold" as a symbol of worth and value, and then received the coup de grâce from a "second:" a similar custom may be found in classical Rome when a general fell upon his sword, or in traditional Japan when a gentleman committed seppuku.

This clears up a great deal of confusion and, though the story is the basic outline provided in <i>Wulu</i>, it goes into a little more detail about Wang Rui's original grudge, and provides very helpful footnotes (I now know more than I ever wished to know about poisoning by metal).

In addition, it tells us much more about Wang Rui's actual position, places more faith in Chen Shou's rendering of the word, and confuses the hell out of me relative to Liu Biao's position. It also contradicts some of what I wrote earlier. I'll make another post after I look through it and decide what to think.
Kongming’s Archives – Romance of the Three Kingdoms Novel, History and Games
“The true measure of a man is how he treats someone that can do him absolutely no good.”
  —Samuel Johnson
User avatar
James
The Big Fish
The Big Fish
 
Posts: 16051
Joined: June 14, 2002
Location: Happy Valley, UT

New postby James on Thu Jan 18, 2007 6:59 pm

Dong Zhou wrote:Well how many people, if given a 100% won't ever get punished, wouldn't kill an enemy? James, the GoS called Cao Yin Grand Administrator with Wang Rui as Inspector so I'm not sure what to believe.

Yeah, as I speculated earlier, actions like Wang Rui's were probably common-place among both those who care for the Han and those who dislike it. And <i>To Establish Peace</i> makes it look more like a slipup that the knowledge got out so perhaps Cao Yin simply blundered.

As for ranks, I need to read through again before I can hope to sort that out.

Dong Zhou wrote:Yep, Governor if Jingzhou was not a postion that gave execution of officers privilage.

Very few positions did and this is what I was going to talk about in my post two above. Most of these ranks were not tied to an authority to execute. With these ranks, though, an officer was also granted <i>jie</i> 節rights—kind of like an accessory to their rank. Their <i>jie</i> rights (or authority, also called <i>zhijie</i> 持節, or ‘Bearing the Staff of Authority’; read: <i>jie</i> rights as applied) gave them permission to take certain actions.

* <i>Shichijie</i> (使持節): Ability to execute anyone below the rank of 2,000 <i>shi</i> (lower to middle-ranked officers) without court approval.
* <i>Chijie</i> (持節): Ability to execute commoners without court approval.
* <i>Jiajie</i> (假節): Ability to execute violators of military law.

<i>Jiajie</i>, commonly granted to generals, would not have applied in this situation. <i>Chijie</i> only applies to commoners. Special exceptions of authority are made, but they are only temporary and for specific situations. <i>Shichijie</i> is the only authority I can see as coming close to this situation, but I doubt Cao Yin made less than 2,000 <i>shi</i>. It <i>is</i> possible that, as a Governor of Jingzhou (if he <i>was</i> a Governor of Jingzhou) he may have had this type of authority. It was sometimes (but not as commonly) granted to authorities that functioned a fair distance from the capital in the name of efficiency. I think it is safe to agree with your assessment.

Dong Zhou wrote:As for the two possibilities, Wang Rui did seem scared when Sun Jian's troops arrived but he may have imagined Sun Jian wouldn't make a move against him before hand. I think a mixture of mine and the second possibility would explain it.

Having read the entry in <i>To Establish Peace</i> this makes most sense.
Kongming’s Archives – Romance of the Three Kingdoms Novel, History and Games
“The true measure of a man is how he treats someone that can do him absolutely no good.”
  —Samuel Johnson
User avatar
James
The Big Fish
The Big Fish
 
Posts: 16051
Joined: June 14, 2002
Location: Happy Valley, UT

New postby James on Fri Jan 19, 2007 12:53 am

Anyway, I have revised the mini-biography I wrote prior to starting this thread with knowledge outlined through discussion here, and with additional information found in Rafe de Crespigny's works. :)

I should also note that I can see clear differences between his duty and Liu Biao's (Wang Rui, for example, was responsible for accompanying Sun Jian on his military commissions—a very inspector-like job). I wonder if Liu Biao was originally carrying out Wang Rui's responsibilities and took advantage of the crumbling government to become a power in his own right? I see no mention of him ever having been promoted along the way.

<hr>
Wang Rui
Lived: AD ?–189


Wang Rui served the Han as Inspector of Jing Province (1). In AD 187 Wang Rui joined the Grand Administrator of Changsha, Sun Jian, to attack bandits in Lingling and Guiyang. Wang Rui was evidently a man of good gentry and background and as such he resented Sun Jian, who was born to a commoner, for his success and the honors that had been bestowed upon him, and for this reason Sun Jian bore a grudge. (2)
<blockquote>(1): Chen Shou in <i>Sanguozhi</i> refers to Wang Rui’s position as ‘Inspector of Jingzhou’. Later, Dong Zhuo appoints Liu Biao to the same position, replacing Wang Rui. Liu Biao’s responsibility is generally accepted to be ‘Governor of Jingzhou’, a position of authority quite unlike that of an inspector. This leads to some confusion. Pei Songzhi, quoting <i>Wulu</i>, refers to Wang Rui’s responsibility as ‘Governor of Jingzhou’. In any case, it is unlikely that either position would have afforded him authority to call for Cao Yin’s execution without first obtaining permission from the capital.

(2): de Crespigny, Rafe, <i>Generals of the South</i>, 106: “It was quite appropriate, and indeed formally necessary, that Wang Rui should have been with Sun Jian in the operations against the rebels outside Changsha. On the other hand, the function of an inspector in this situation was primarily to supervise the military action and prevent any individual commander from establishing a local military dominance. The real credit for the campaign had gone to Sun Jian, and this, together with his remarkable promotion to Grand Administrator and his subsequent enfeoffment as a marquis, caused jealousy and tension. Wang Rui, a man from good gentry family, presumably made some unguarded remark that a commandery would be better in the hands of trained and experienced administrators, while fighting men should act only as assistants. [<i>SGZ</i> Wu 1] Whatever the insult, Sun Jian remembered it.”</blockquote>Later, when provinces and commanderies were gathering troops to attack Dong Zhuo, Wang Rui and Sun Jian also raised troops. Wang Rui, however, had quarreled with Cao Yin, Grand Administrator of Wuling, and hence announced his intention to have him killed before setting out to the capital. (3)
<blockquote>(3): Wang Rui, apparently, slipped up and announced his intentions in public. <i>To Establish Peace</i> II 51 note #22.</blockquote>Cao Yin was alarmed by this and, thinking to turn Sun Jian’s arrival to his own advantage, forged a letter from the Itinerant Commissioner of Investigation and sent it to Sun Jian. The order cited various crimes and faults of Wang Rui and authorized Sun Jian to arrest him, execute him, and submit a report. As soon as Sun Jian received the report he mobilized his troops.

When Wang Rui heard an army was coming he surveyed them from a tower and dispatched a messenger to learn their intentions. Sun Jian’s vanguard explained that they had not been compensated properly and couldn’t even afford to buy clothing. Wang Rui, who did not yet know that Sun Jian was leading the troops, protested, “How could a governor be stingy to his men?” He opened his storehouses and asked the troops to enter the city so they could see for themselves that he was not withholding anything.

When the troops entered and came under Wang Rui’s tower he noticed Sun Jian. Shocked, he asked, “These troops are here to ask for reward. What are you, Prefect Sun, doing with them?” Sun Jian replied, “I have an imperial emissary’s decree calling for your execution.” Wang cried, “But what crime have I committed?” Sun Jian replied, “The crime of not knowing anything.” Wang Rui committed suicide by drinking wine with gold flakes (4).
<blockquote>(4): The golden flakes would be poisonous and thus the cause of death. As noted in de Crespigny, Rafe, <i>To Establish Peace</i> II 51-52, note #26, consumption of metal flakes or lumps was not an uncommon means of committing suicide in Chinese history, and is a tradition that even appears in recent centuries. <i>Zizhi tongjian</i> footnotes include commentary from Tao Hongjing who explains that some “raw gold” is poisonous until it has been refined through smelting. Still reading from de Crespigny’s notes, Tao’s remakrks are cited again in commentary to the section on Gold in <i>Bencao gangmu</i> 8, 3-4, which also quotes the eighth-century scholar Chen Cangqi, who tells of a poisonous raw gold found in the far south which resembled red and black gravel. For a highly detailed discussion, please reference <i>To Establish Peace</i> II, 52 note #26.</blockquote>From Sun Jian’s perspective this was a satisfactory outcome and the legitimacy of the decree was probably of no great concern. He could always claim that he believed it to be genuine and this also afforded him an opportunity to do away with Wang Rui. Not only was he able to bring closure to his private grudge but he also added Wang Rui’s soldiers to his own army. If Wang Rui was powerful enough to threaten the Grand Administrator [Cao Yin] he held the majority of troops in Wuling, and he may have had levies from other parts in the province. (5)
<blockquote>(5): Paraphrased from de Crespigny, Rafe, <i>Generals of the South</i>, 107.</blockquote>Chen Shou’s explanation in <i>Sanguozhi</i> reads simply, “Wang Rui, the Inspector of Jingzhou, never showed courtesy to him [Sun Jian] in their meetings. So Sun Jian killed him as he passed his territory.” It is also worth noting that Chen Shou identifies Wang Rui as ‘Inspector of Jingzhou’, a post that would not have permitted him to call for an officer’s execution, rather than Governor of Jingzhou, which may have been assigned with such authority relative to military law.
Kongming’s Archives – Romance of the Three Kingdoms Novel, History and Games
“The true measure of a man is how he treats someone that can do him absolutely no good.”
  —Samuel Johnson
User avatar
James
The Big Fish
The Big Fish
 
Posts: 16051
Joined: June 14, 2002
Location: Happy Valley, UT

New postby Xu Yuan on Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:39 am

Eh? I found the end of this Inspector, Governor mystery and it was under our noses the whole time, but I'm not sure if there's any debate about it...

Liu Biao's SGZ wrote:After Li Jue, Guo Si and some of the former officers of Dong Zhuo captured Chang An, they tried to ally with Liu Biao so that he could act as their reinforcement. In order to do that, they proclaimed Liu Biao as Zhen Nan Jiang Jun (General who Suppressed the South), Governor of Jing province (Jing Zhou Mu), and the Marquis of Cheng Wu. In addition, they issued Liu Biao an Imperial Court Order (Fu Jie). Not long after,
So he was in the end given a promotion to Governor, so apparently he was the acting inspecor as he made those massive land grabs.
As you know security
is mortal's greatest enemy.
User avatar
Xu Yuan
Changshi
 
Posts: 400
Joined: June 28, 2005

New postby James on Fri Jan 19, 2007 6:07 am

Liu Biao, you sly dog you…

Thanks, Xu Yuan, that clears up my last unknown.
Kongming’s Archives – Romance of the Three Kingdoms Novel, History and Games
“The true measure of a man is how he treats someone that can do him absolutely no good.”
  —Samuel Johnson
User avatar
James
The Big Fish
The Big Fish
 
Posts: 16051
Joined: June 14, 2002
Location: Happy Valley, UT

New postby Dong Zhou on Fri Jan 19, 2007 8:10 am

Regarding execution authority, two governorships came with a "do as you please" as they had tribes next to them and were so far away from the court that it made sense to let them have leeway. I think otherwise only really trusted men or in times of major trouble was such authority granted
“You, are a rebellious son who abandoned his father. You are a cruel brigand who murdered his lord. How can Heaven and Earth put up with you for long? And unless you die soon, how can you face the sight of men?”
User avatar
Dong Zhou
A-Dou
A-Dou
 
Posts: 6157
Joined: April 10, 2005
Location: "Now we must die. May Your Majesty maintain yourself"

New postby James on Fri Jan 19, 2007 8:37 am

Dong Zhou wrote:Regarding execution authority, two governorships came with a "do as you please" as they had tribes next to them and were so far away from the court that it made sense to let them have leeway. I think otherwise only really trusted men or in times of major trouble was such authority granted

<i>Jie</i> authority was granted in a number of other cases but almost never to the extreme you've outlined above. <i>Jie</i> authority (of the various kinds mentioned above) were also often-times tied to certain ranks with slight variation while moving through the times. Generally, though, it is in cases where the authority was important that it was granted. A governor far from the capital might have the authority necessary to roll a number of heads while the same rank closer to home has no such authority.

I tossed up a preliminary outline of this stuff in our ol' Tiger Tally thread. :)

Thanks for mentioning the barbarian border cases, though! That is quite interesting—especially if it was a 'do as you please' policy, which I haven't even seen an example of before. Do you happen to recall where you read about it?
Kongming’s Archives – Romance of the Three Kingdoms Novel, History and Games
“The true measure of a man is how he treats someone that can do him absolutely no good.”
  —Samuel Johnson
User avatar
James
The Big Fish
The Big Fish
 
Posts: 16051
Joined: June 14, 2002
Location: Happy Valley, UT

New postby Dong Zhou on Fri Jan 19, 2007 11:28 am

I think somewhere in the Huang/Ling bit of the ZZTJ, possibly a note in it by Rafe de Crespigny. Or my memory is playing tricks on me, in which case I apologise.
“You, are a rebellious son who abandoned his father. You are a cruel brigand who murdered his lord. How can Heaven and Earth put up with you for long? And unless you die soon, how can you face the sight of men?”
User avatar
Dong Zhou
A-Dou
A-Dou
 
Posts: 6157
Joined: April 10, 2005
Location: "Now we must die. May Your Majesty maintain yourself"

PreviousNext

Return to Sanguo Yanyi Symposium

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Crazedmongoose, mrbeate, Yahoo [Bot] and 2 guests

Copyright © 2002–2008 Kongming’s Archives. All Rights Reserved