Seen Any Good Plays Recently?

The place to hang out with your fellow scholars, have a drink, share a laugh and enjoy each other's company.

Re: Seen Any Good Plays Recently?

Unread postby Dong Zhou » Fri May 19, 2017 7:44 pm

Tried BBC and Mike Bartlett's adaptation of his play King Charles III. Premise: The Queen is dead and Charles (the late Tim Pigott-Smith) is now the monarch of Great Britain. When Prime Minister (Adam James) wants to enact strong press regulation, the new King refuses to give his assent, plunging the country into a constitutional crises.

This got attention as the Mail and a few Tory MP's demanded the BBC heads be burnt at the stake for heresy. Was there reason for the reaction? Not that I can see from the 40 minutes or so I gave it. If your opposed to the idea of fiction showing what happens after the current monarch is dead then not for you (also don't do House of Cards UK season 2) but hardly heresy. Like any fictional thing based on real people, the portrayal of people isn't 100% accurate with some people have personalities completely changed for story purposes (Charlotte Riley's Kate Middleton bears no resemblance to the actual person bar being the right gender). Where I had disquiet was having Diana (Katie Brayben) as a ghost (did feel like intruding on private grief there) and one scene
basically Mike Bartlett decided the Queen shares his values.


It felt like it gladly did TV and used it for sets, which led to lovely palace sets but also some really poor ones like the badly fake 10 Downing Street, but didn't adapt the play for it. Using dialogue to say what your doing makes sense in a play where the audience might struggle to see but in a TV production where the camera is zoomed in? Feels clunky. Cast is pretty good and do tend to look like the people they are meant to be playing. Dialogue is mixed, Charles Shakespearean monologues can work very well but I do wonder if it might have been better if other characters spoke in a more casual fashion and there are some extreme clunkers. Bartlett clearly has a political side and it really comes across in the play, particularly with Harry (Richard Goulding) and Jess (Tamara Lawrance) where the values of the writer beats you over the head. Which is a pity becuase, once you get past a quite offensive introduction by Jess that should have seen her barred from Harry's presence, there is the basis of a good idea wit Harry's storyline
the prince with no purpose, not sure what to do with his life.


There are themes that if done right, could make a great play like the constitutional crises if a monarch refused to sign the law for example but by the time I left, it just had been feeling empty, that it hadn't turned the idea's into strong substance.
“You, are a rebellious son who abandoned his father. You are a cruel brigand who murdered his lord. How can Heaven and Earth put up with you for long? And unless you die soon, how can you face the sight of men?”
User avatar
Dong Zhou
A-Dou
A-Dou
 
Posts: 15333
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: "Now we must die. May Your Majesty maintain yourself"

Re: Seen Any Good Plays Recently?

Unread postby Dong Zhou » Wed Nov 01, 2017 9:28 am

Watched adaptation of Othello O. Set in American highschool, Hugo (Josh Hartnett) is frustrated when younger basketball player Odin James (Mekhi Phifer) is named MVP by Hugo's father and team coach Duke Goulding (Martin Sheen). So Hugo begins plotting....

This had a tendency for "one scene good, next scene clumsy" and while full of a good enjoyable scenes, is poorly constructed. For example the ending has two powerful scenes but is somewhat undermined as it doesn't fit in with the entire rest of the film. Plenty of positives, the main romance of Odin and Desi (Julia Stiles) works very well and carries the film at times, I liked Hugo's girlfriend Emily (Rain Phoenix) but she is barely in it which is frustrating, the young cast did well, basketball scenes didn't seem bad, some good scenes.

Then there are the negatives, some scenes particularly in first half feel clunky when the writing isn't as smooth as one would like and it feels like overly flowery exposition. This is a film that could have badly used a ten minute build up showing characters relations and dynamics. For example being told Hugo is friends with everyone but we get no sense of that at all until the film suddenly requires it for plot reasons. Hugo lacks something to make him really stand out as a friend or a great wily figure, sometimes characters seemed to agree to something they had no real reason to do so.
“You, are a rebellious son who abandoned his father. You are a cruel brigand who murdered his lord. How can Heaven and Earth put up with you for long? And unless you die soon, how can you face the sight of men?”
User avatar
Dong Zhou
A-Dou
A-Dou
 
Posts: 15333
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: "Now we must die. May Your Majesty maintain yourself"

Re: Seen Any Good Plays Recently?

Unread postby Dong Zhou » Wed Jan 03, 2018 5:40 pm

Watched Christmas Carol Gone Wrong. Premise: After last year's farce, Cornley Polytechnic Drama Society are barred from the BBC but they have a plan. Seizing control of Derek Jacobi's live TV production of Christmas Carol with aunt Diana (Diana Rigg) narrating, they put on their own special version.

Was this good? Yes bar one passage
when they went outside
, it was a funny, enjoyable production with farce, slapstick and all round good times. Nicely set up as they take control, the infighting between Chris (Henry Shields) and Robert (Henry Lewis) has good moments, the "Dennis (Jonathan Sayer) can never remember his lines" shtick had got old in Peter Pan but was brilliantly done here, the "outside the play" moments were segued in well and very entertaining, romance had good scenes despite other issues with it. If this was the first time I had seen their work, I would be looking forward to the sequel.

Yet becuase of the excellent of their Peter Pan, as fun as this, it feels like a disappointment. Like a perfectly good sequel to a great movie, it doesn't hit it's forebear's heights so there is that tinge of disappointment. Some of the jokes (like some of the rivalry moments or backstage guy caught on screen) feel forced at times rather then a natural occurrence, the cameos feel like "people like cameos" so whereas Suchet got a character integrated into the play, Rigg's role is a complete waste while Jacobi has only a few moments of comedy, I felt it curbed back on some of the more adult innuendo or costume incidents but sister disagrees.

I don't think the format helped. Scrooge has one big role and everyone else has a small role, this can make ensemble pieces very difficult and characters got squeezed despite their best efforts, this hampered various figures and meant the romance didn't have power for the ending phase despite the cast chemistry that managed to carry it as far as they did. Perhaps they would have been better not going for "exact same group as last time" story and pretending they were different people, focusing on the one or two they could give time too? There also seemed far less room for "ad-lib as something has gone wrong" moments or lines that are always in the play/story but due to events take on a new hilarious meaning (or a sense of nonsense) with the cast reacting to that (example from Pan, a "calm peaceful lullaby" yelled out as backstage makes a lot of noise). There was one example of each during the Scrooge story, both brilliant moments but it made one realize how little there had been on of it.

Fingers crossed there is another next year!
“You, are a rebellious son who abandoned his father. You are a cruel brigand who murdered his lord. How can Heaven and Earth put up with you for long? And unless you die soon, how can you face the sight of men?”
User avatar
Dong Zhou
A-Dou
A-Dou
 
Posts: 15333
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: "Now we must die. May Your Majesty maintain yourself"

Previous

Return to The Pub

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

Copyright © 2002–2008 Kongming’s Archives. All Rights Reserved