War on Scientology

Discuss events that have an impact on you and the world today. A home for honest, serious, and open discussion.

Re: War on Scientology

Unread postby Dong Zhou » Sun Jan 26, 2014 11:24 am

Judging my experiences, Aygor's argument could be used to shut down the Catholic Church in England. Which, while tempting, wouldn't sit comfortable with me (ignoring my Catholic faith) and so I wouldn't be happy seeing Scientology made illegal.
“You, are a rebellious son who abandoned his father. You are a cruel brigand who murdered his lord. How can Heaven and Earth put up with you for long? And unless you die soon, how can you face the sight of men?”
User avatar
Dong Zhou
A-Dou
A-Dou
 
Posts: 14688
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: "Now we must die. May Your Majesty maintain yourself"

Re: War on Scientology

Unread postby Aygor » Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:02 pm

Dong Zhou wrote:Judging my experiences, Aygor's argument could be used to shut down the Catholic Church in England.

It surprises me that it could actually, why do you think so?

Also, if I may ask, why tempting? honest curiosity
分久必合,合久必分
Ἀτύφως μὲν λαβεῖν, εὐλύτως δὲ ἀφεῖναι
User avatar
Aygor
Langzhong
 
Posts: 536
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 5:09 pm

Re: War on Scientology

Unread postby Dong Zhou » Sun Jan 26, 2014 8:19 pm

If one is banning a religion because it exploits it's followers for cash, labour and so on then my experiences with that church, more then once, would suggest it would also need to go. Your lucky if the priest offers so much as confession let alone anything else but it wants your money, money money money money and did I mention? MONEY! In rare cases, labour but they prefer money generally. The parishes and so on I have been in show little concern, beyond the mandated collections, for the poor or the needy or to seek out those that need help.

I don't know if showing contempt for the officers of the law gives bonus points towards being kicked out?

Also, if I may ask, why tempting? honest curiosity


Because I'm a vindictive sort who needs to be better at forgiving what they did.
“You, are a rebellious son who abandoned his father. You are a cruel brigand who murdered his lord. How can Heaven and Earth put up with you for long? And unless you die soon, how can you face the sight of men?”
User avatar
Dong Zhou
A-Dou
A-Dou
 
Posts: 14688
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: "Now we must die. May Your Majesty maintain yourself"

Re: War on Scientology

Unread postby Jordan » Sun Jan 26, 2014 8:39 pm

I would argue that the leap of faith required by other religions is not functional to abuse.


I wouldn't though. Plenty of other religious institutions solicit their adherents for cash. Here in Southern California, my experience has been that many religious institutions are largely corporatized. In addition, I've heard stories about some rather dubious cultish organizations here from a wide range of religions (protestant to buddhist). I wish I could find the name of one specific Buddhist one I heard of, but I'm having trouble at the moment. I learned about it in an East Asian History class I took in college from a professor who had experience dealing with them and quickly realized that they were a super sketchy cult who were doing many of the things Scientology is infamous for. He worked for them because they paid him very well, provided he sell his soul and morals. :lol:

A profit oriented organization which uses falsities to misdirect and exploit acolytes, is in my opinion a deceit and as a deceit should be viewed and dealed with.


It's a thin line though. Dong Zhou has already explained his reasons for doubting the Catholic Church in the UK. It's very hard to determine what counts as misdirecting and exploiting rather than simply...uh...entreating? I dunno what the right word to use in this case is, but plenty of other religions are manipulative in some way that is still perfectly legal. :)


I am talking about juridical neutrality towards a fraud due to the religion label rather than the obvious right of everyone to criticize what they do not like.


If they are breaking fraud laws, I agree that they are breaking fraud laws regardless of their status as a religion or anything else. However, as my knowledge of fraud laws is nonexistent and my legal knowledge poor in general, I cannot comment further on this issue.

I accept, obviously, the freedom of belief, I do not accept the indoctrination of others whose purpose is their exploitation.


Another very thin line.
User avatar
Jordan
Scholar of Shen Zhou
 
Posts: 5884
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 4:52 am

Re: War on Scientology

Unread postby Aygor » Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:00 am

Jordan wrote:
I would argue that the leap of faith required by other religions is not functional to abuse.

I wouldn't though.[...]

I get your and Dong Zhou's objection, that isn't what I am arguing though.
The main religions are not organizations founded to profit through their disciples, if they could on whichever level be argued to do so the blame is on the personnel who betrays the principles he is supposed to represent.

The point stands for organizations which knowingly feed false information to lucrate at the expenses of who falls for it.

Jordan wrote:It's a thin line though.
Another very thin line.

Thin but definite lines nonetheless.
分久必合,合久必分
Ἀτύφως μὲν λαβεῖν, εὐλύτως δὲ ἀφεῖναι
User avatar
Aygor
Langzhong
 
Posts: 536
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 5:09 pm

Re: War on Scientology

Unread postby Sun Fin » Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:05 am

My worry would be that the precedent set to challenge the Church of Scientology could then be used against any religion the state disagrees with.
“I learned that courage was not the absence of fear, but the triumph over it. The brave man is not he who does not feel afraid, but he who conquers that fear.” ― Nelson Mandela
User avatar
Sun Fin
Scholar of Shen Zhou
 
Posts: 6567
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 9:20 pm
Location: The birthplace of radio

Re: War on Scientology

Unread postby Dong Zhou » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:39 pm

The main religions are not organizations founded to profit through their disciples, if they could on whichever level be argued to do so the blame is on the personnel who betrays the principles he is supposed to represent.


Yet I saw this things supported at higher levels as well including defiance of the police, bad attitudes towards woman, stuff the poor and so on.

The point stands for organizations which knowingly feed false information to lucrate at the expenses of who falls for it.


So the Catholic Church in England?
“You, are a rebellious son who abandoned his father. You are a cruel brigand who murdered his lord. How can Heaven and Earth put up with you for long? And unless you die soon, how can you face the sight of men?”
User avatar
Dong Zhou
A-Dou
A-Dou
 
Posts: 14688
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: "Now we must die. May Your Majesty maintain yourself"

Re: War on Scientology

Unread postby Aygor » Mon Jan 27, 2014 1:19 pm

Dong Zhou wrote:
The main religions are not organizations founded to profit through their disciples, if they could on whichever level be argued to do so the blame is on the personnel who betrays the principles he is supposed to represent.

Yet I saw this things supported at higher levels as well including defiance of the police, bad attitudes towards woman, stuff the poor and so on.

If the pope himself spread lies as a mean of profit, it would mean that the people who lead that organization are corrupted and in defiance of it's purpose, it would not mean that the purpose of that organization is profit through guillability.

Dong Zhou wrote:
The point stands for organizations which knowingly feed false information to lucrate at the expenses of who falls for it.

So the Catholic Church in England?

Which part of the dogma proposed by the catholic church in england is oriented to lucrate at the expenses of the faithful?
分久必合,合久必分
Ἀτύφως μὲν λαβεῖν, εὐλύτως δὲ ἀφεῖναι
User avatar
Aygor
Langzhong
 
Posts: 536
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 5:09 pm

Re: War on Scientology

Unread postby Dong Zhou » Mon Jan 27, 2014 1:54 pm

It seems like religion fleecing people and ignoring the law is ok as long as one doesn't write it down as dogma? Just do it in practise but not in the texts?

If Scientology just rewrote it's texts to suit which leader dislikes it and then it will be ok to do what it is doing anyway?

Thinking about it, I'm not sure how relevant the Pope is to the Catholic Church in England (in practise) so would the Cardinal be the main man for how this law would work? Ditto for other religions, would national leaders be the figures to keep an eye on rather then overall head?
“You, are a rebellious son who abandoned his father. You are a cruel brigand who murdered his lord. How can Heaven and Earth put up with you for long? And unless you die soon, how can you face the sight of men?”
User avatar
Dong Zhou
A-Dou
A-Dou
 
Posts: 14688
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: "Now we must die. May Your Majesty maintain yourself"

Re: War on Scientology

Unread postby Aygor » Mon Jan 27, 2014 2:27 pm

Dong Zhou wrote:It seems like religion fleecing people and ignoring the law is ok as long as one doesn't write it down as dogma? Just do it in practise but not in the texts?

It just is a different issue.
I am referring to the difference between a mafia organization and a corrupted government, the difference between an organization which is there to profit through harm and another which is there for good reasons but whose power is misused by unjust people.
I am not trying to make a comparison, just to clarify what I mean.

Dong Zhou wrote:would national leaders be the figures to keep an eye on rather then overall head?

I personally think that judging an organization one should consider it's constitutive purpose and structure rather than the personnel (even the head personnel) contingently running it.
分久必合,合久必分
Ἀτύφως μὲν λαβεῖν, εὐλύτως δὲ ἀφεῖναι
User avatar
Aygor
Langzhong
 
Posts: 536
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 5:09 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Copyright © 2002–2008 Kongming’s Archives. All Rights Reserved