Wei Yan

New postby Sima Hui on Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:16 am

Exar Kun wrote:
Six_and_Up wrote:Besides why would Changan be lightly defended? Its one of the main capitals. If anything troops would be stationed there first and then sent to other areas of China.


Not only that but after the secession by Liangzhou in 184 the Han fortified Chang An and its environs to be the main fort for resisting Qiang rebellions in thw west.


I think I know the answer.

Sima Yi knew that Zhuge Liang was an extremely careful man. He knew that even if this plan were proposed, Zhuge would reject it on the grounds that it was too risky. He could therefore leave only a few hundred troops at Chang'an. He also knew that the Qiang would not attack because they had not yet been brought into the war by Zhuge.

That's my two cents at least. :wink:
This topic is an affront to both The Man and The Son of the Man.

-Ts'aoist

Ssuma I sucks.
He was okay when he was an obedient slave of The Man.


-Ts'aoist

Join the Cult and receive the True and Holy Word of The Man.
Sima Hui
Cult of Ts'aoist
 
Posts: 1670
Joined: December 10, 2003
Location: Serving the Most Sacred Disciple of the Man

New postby Exar Kun on Mon Jul 19, 2004 9:51 pm

Well firstly,simply the size of Chang An's population requires a decent sized garrison.
Secondly,the tribes don't wait for anyone.They have never needed an invitation to the party and they attack whenever they feel like it.

And third,well,of course,historically Cao Zhen was the man in charge at this point.
"Two there should be; no more, no less.
One to embody the power, the other to crave it."
-Creed of the New Sith-
User avatar
Exar Kun
Dark Lord of the Sith
 
Posts: 3293
Joined: January 22, 2003
Location: Cruising the Nether

New postby Po Hsing on Tue Jul 20, 2004 2:12 am

Well, for what it is worth, Ma Chao did take Chang-An so I suppose it is possible for Wei Yan's plan to work, or did that not happen historically?

Perhaps this question is moot because the Wei Yan suggestion is probably not recorded in history as well, so we are only left with historical conjectures.
Po Hsing
Initiate
 
Posts: 64
Joined: June 23, 2004

New postby Sima Hui on Tue Jul 20, 2004 10:22 am

Exar Kun wrote:Well firstly,simply the size of Chang An's population requires a decent sized garrison.
Secondly,the tribes don't wait for anyone.They have never needed an invitation to the party and they attack whenever they feel like it.

And third,well,of course,historically Cao Zhen was the man in charge at this point.


Hmmm, good point. However, Ma Chao easily took Chang'an. He didn't even have a good strategist. If there was a decent sized garrison there, then Ma Chao would have had problems.
This topic is an affront to both The Man and The Son of the Man.

-Ts'aoist

Ssuma I sucks.
He was okay when he was an obedient slave of The Man.


-Ts'aoist

Join the Cult and receive the True and Holy Word of The Man.
Sima Hui
Cult of Ts'aoist
 
Posts: 1670
Joined: December 10, 2003
Location: Serving the Most Sacred Disciple of the Man

New postby Shield of Rohan on Tue Jul 20, 2004 6:30 pm

Ma Chao stormed the massive Army of Liang on the city, which Cao apparently did not forsee (though I expect it still had a sizable garrison). Cao Hong tried to reinforce it, but Ma Chao beat him and sent him running.

Ma Chao, though, had only allies behind him, and was able to concentrate all his fury on a surprised city. He was also a great general, able to beat well-led reinforcement armies easily. Under these circumstances, a strategist was not needed. One would have been helpful at Tong Gate though :wink: ...
"I have gained this by philosophy: that I do without being commanded, what others do only from fear of the law." -Aristotle
User avatar
Shield of Rohan
Scholar of Shen Zhou
 
Posts: 2157
Joined: December 14, 2002
Location: Atlanta. No, scratch that: Utah.

New postby White Horse General on Tue Jul 20, 2004 9:07 pm

Hehe, if Ma Chao had a great strategist on hand at Tong Gate we could probably have said bye bye to Cao Cao right there.
Sings we a dance of wolves;
Who smell fear and slay a coward.
Sings we a dance of man;
Who smells gold and slays his brother.
White Horse General
Master
 
Posts: 224
Joined: November 5, 2003
Location: My Snorlax ran away....

New postby Shield of Rohan on Wed Jul 21, 2004 5:22 pm

Alas, such was the fate of Ma Teng/Chao, and Gongsun Zan :( . Great armies, leaders, and mighty generals, but lacking the advisors to make reunification possible. Liu Bei was the only strong Han loyalist blessed with warlords such as Zhuge Liang, Pang Tong, and Fa Zheng.
"I have gained this by philosophy: that I do without being commanded, what others do only from fear of the law." -Aristotle
User avatar
Shield of Rohan
Scholar of Shen Zhou
 
Posts: 2157
Joined: December 14, 2002
Location: Atlanta. No, scratch that: Utah.

New postby Liu Yuante on Thu Jul 22, 2004 12:32 am

Shield of Rohan wrote:Alas, such was the fate of Ma Teng/Chao, and Gongsun Zan :( . Great armies, leaders, and mighty generals, but lacking the advisors to make reunification possible. Liu Bei was the only strong Han loyalist blessed with warlords such as Zhuge Liang, Pang Tong, and Fa Zheng.


And the fact that even Liu Bei couldn't ultimately prevail I think focuses some doubt on whether such an individual would have really kept the Ma or Gongsun Zan going.

Adrian
Registered users: Exabot [Bot], Google [Bot], Liu Yuante, Yahoo [Bot]
User avatar
Liu Yuante
绯红王
 
Posts: 2522
Joined: April 11, 2004

New postby LiuBeiwasGreat on Thu Jul 22, 2004 12:50 am

LiuYuanTe wrote:
Shield of Rohan wrote:Alas, such was the fate of Ma Teng/Chao, and Gongsun Zan :( . Great armies, leaders, and mighty generals, but lacking the advisors to make reunification possible. Liu Bei was the only strong Han loyalist blessed with warlords such as Zhuge Liang, Pang Tong, and Fa Zheng.


And the fact that even Liu Bei couldn't ultimately prevail I think focuses some doubt on whether such an individual would have really kept the Ma or Gongsun Zan going.

Adrian


Well considering that Gonsun Zan was a better military leader then Liu Bei it might have been interesting seeing him having a good stratagist
LiuBeiwasGreat
Scholar of Shen Zhou
 
Posts: 2079
Joined: March 22, 2004
Location: Queens NY

New postby Exar Kun on Thu Jul 22, 2004 4:16 am

LiuBeiwasGreat wrote:Well considering that Gonsun Zan was a better military leader then Liu Bei it might have been interesting seeing him having a good stratagist


I'm waiting with breathless anticipation to see how exactly you go about proving this. :roll:

That statement is utter nonesense.If Gongsun Zan were really a cut above the rest he would have lasted as a warlord.
"Two there should be; no more, no less.
One to embody the power, the other to crave it."
-Creed of the New Sith-
User avatar
Exar Kun
Dark Lord of the Sith
 
Posts: 3293
Joined: January 22, 2003
Location: Cruising the Nether

PreviousNext

Return to Sanguo Yanyi Symposium

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: GuoBia and 0 guests

Copyright © 2002–2008 Kongming’s Archives. All Rights Reserved