CaTigeReptile wrote:Why are there only two ways? I'd say he had a good head on his shoulders for sure, but he might have not been as brilliant as it is perceived. He was smart, but not "SMART smart". I'm sorry I'm not eloquent today.
CaTigeReptile wrote:To be quite blunt, I mean "81 int" smart. I mean the extensive level of smartness some people think he is. It's a relative scale; how am I to explain it? I mean, what did he do to ever give an impression of higher intelligence? (As L_K put with eloquency.)
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 7 guests
Copyright © 2002–2008 Kongming’s Archives. All Rights Reserved