Is Dong Zhuo all that bad???

Join the Romance of the Three Kingdoms discussion with our resident Scholars. Topics relating to the novel and history are both welcome. Don't forget to check the Forum Rules before posting.
Kongming’s Archives: Romance of the Three Kingdoms
Three Kingdoms Officer Biographies
Three Kingdoms Officer Encyclopedia
Scholars of Shen Zhou Search Tool

Is Dong Zhuo all that bad???

Unread postby Shah Muhammad III » Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:47 pm

I mean c'mon at least he tried to help the country, and the book is biased against him it's not even funny, they never metion his Qiang campians or the fact that he was active and back then a decent person. Now emperor Ling on the other hand just did not care and makes Louis XVI look good, becuase all he really did was let Zhang Rang and the other nine eunuchs run the country,who more or less let there friend's or family have goverment posts,but back on topic aside from buring down Luo Yang, building a massive harlem and killing emperor shao is he really that bad p.s sry for the wall of text if i try to space it might delete my post and force me to retype it
Last edited by Shah Muhammad III on Fri Jan 18, 2008 3:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Denn du bist was du isst Und ihr wisst was es ist ,stein um stein mauer ich dich ein
User avatar
Shah Muhammad III
Academic
 
Posts: 194
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:07 pm
Location: On The Big Geti Star with Metal Cooler

Unread postby LiuBeiwasGreat » Thu Jan 17, 2008 10:31 pm

Yeah he really is that bad, he butchered innocent people, he order imperial tombs to be dug up, he had prisoners beaten to death, he was quite bad. I am sure other members can elaborate much better then i can though.
"If you can't drink a lobbyist's whiskey, take his money, sleep with his women and still vote against him in the morning, you don't belong in politics."
LiuBeiwasGreat
Scholar of Shen Zhou
 
Posts: 2505
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 4:13 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

Unread postby Kong Wen » Thu Jan 17, 2008 10:54 pm

It depends on which Dong Zhuo you're talking about. The historical Dong Zhuo of course had many great political and military accomplishments in the northwest, so if you're asking whether the historical DZ is as bad as the novel DZ, then no, I suppose not, if only because there are some "virtues" that are dismissed/ignored.

But you also say that the novel is "biased against him" and that makes your question a little more ambiguous. The novel is not biased against him in any practical way, since DZ had been dead for centuries by the time the novel was written. Its "bias" is simply a narrative storytelling decision by the artist. DZ's military accomplishments against the Qiang are not highlighted for the same reason that Luke Skywalker doesn't appear in the book—they are not important to the novel's internal fictional universe. So if you're asking if the novel's DZ has some overlooked merits, then the answer is no, what you see is what you get.

I suspect you're simply seeking a reevaluation of the historical DZ, though, and interpreting the novel's characterization of a figure based on the historical DZ as an injustice, but it's more helpful to maintain the two as distinct entities.
"We spread the time as we can, but in the end the world takes it all back."
— Roland Deschain, Wolves of the Calla
User avatar
Kong Wen
The Bronze Age of SoSZ
The Bronze Age of SoSZ
 
Posts: 11832
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 7:38 pm
Location: Canada

Unread postby Lord Lu Xun » Fri Jan 18, 2008 2:52 am

He did do some cruel acts, but he had his merits and wasnt really ALL that bad. Still, not many people could call him a man of virtue. I mean, most of the warlords in the land mobilised against him for his deposition and murder of emperor Shao. By the way, change your title so it doesn't say Dong Zhou.
Speed is the essence of war- Sun Tzu
User avatar
Lord Lu Xun
Academic
 
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 7:03 am
Location: The imperial palace of Jianye.

Unread postby James » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:48 am

Well, yeah... I'll submit that he was all that bad. His actions in Luoyang alone (even historically) qualify him for that award, I would have to say. I wouldn't be surprised if they are somewhat reflective of his habits elsewhere as well.
Kongming’s Archives – Romance of the Three Kingdoms Novel, History and Games
“ They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
  — Ben Franklin
User avatar
James
Sausaged Fish
Sausaged Fish
 
Posts: 17946
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2002 3:21 pm
Location: Happy Valley, UT

Unread postby Antiochus » Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:21 am

Also, he is widely responsible for pushing the chaos even further, allowing the Three Kingdom era to take place much easier by weakening the imperial power to the breaking point.

After the Dong Zhuo regency, the Han had lost any illusion of power it still had and Cao Cao simply took itfor what it became, a purely simbolic figurehead.
If they can abolish fanaticism, let us pray for the advent of the sceptics.

Raymond Aron
The Opium of the Intellectuals
User avatar
Antiochus
Scholar of Shen Zhou
 
Posts: 2573
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2003 5:29 pm
Location: Sherbrooke

Unread postby Cao Ah Man » Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:32 am

Had Dong Zhuo actually ACCOMPLISHED anything, then perhaps he would not be "all that bad." Yes, it's true that Emperor Ling had allowed the situation to degenerate. And yes, it's true that Dong Zhuo may have had the good of the state originally at heart. But whether or not power corrupts, his actions hardly were those to keep the Empire stable. Rather, as we've seen in history, they have done quite the opposite and only brought the dynasty down lower, and that's not even mentioning some of his more crueler acts which he did in both the novel AND history, i.e. the slaughtering of peasants, deposition and murder of the Emperor, and the oppression of loyal ministers.

So yes, he most certainly was "all that bad."
Cao Ah Man
Scholar
 
Posts: 328
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 8:35 am
Location: London, England

Unread postby Dong Zhou » Fri Jan 18, 2008 8:00 am

The novel Dong though isn't even allowed to be a good general, everything he fights is defeat and cowardly. I was somewhat surprised he was allowed to be strong and not needed to be rescued by girl scouts
“You, are a rebellious son who abandoned his father. You are a cruel brigand who murdered his lord. How can Heaven and Earth put up with you for long? And unless you die soon, how can you face the sight of men?”
User avatar
Dong Zhou
A-Dou
A-Dou
 
Posts: 14893
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: "Now we must die. May Your Majesty maintain yourself"

Unread postby Shi Tong » Fri Jan 18, 2008 1:10 pm

If your definition of bad means that these things are ok:

aside from buring down Luo Yang, building a massive harlem and killing emperor shao is he really that bad


Then that's ok, he was a great man.

The above alone can constitute a pretty bad person. Even with his military campaigns, burning Luo Yang and desecrating the Han tombs and deposing the rightful emperor probably destroyed the Han on those two alone.
User avatar
Shi Tong
Stupid Egg of Shen Zhou
 
Posts: 4034
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 10:12 pm
Location: London, England

Unread postby Shah Muhammad III » Fri Jan 18, 2008 11:23 pm

I only say it is biased becuase it make's ZGL seem like the best commander in that book, except at chen chang anyway, but also the Han and Shu-Han in general only becuase it makes them seem so just when Emperor ling wasn't and didn't Liu Bei depose,Liu Yan a distant relative of his, and Shi Tong those reasons do not constitue being ok nor do i think they are ok, and Dong Zhuo i know is not a saint, but he can't be that evil who makes Fred Phleps seem sane [puts on flame retardent suit and hides] :(
Denn du bist was du isst Und ihr wisst was es ist ,stein um stein mauer ich dich ein
User avatar
Shah Muhammad III
Academic
 
Posts: 194
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:07 pm
Location: On The Big Geti Star with Metal Cooler

Next

Return to Sanguo Yanyi Symposium

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

Copyright © 2002–2008 Kongming’s Archives. All Rights Reserved